Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Count pregnancy leave toward FMLA?

Q: Can my employer count leave taken due to pregnancy complications against the 12 weeks of FMLA leave for the birth and care of my child?

A: Yes. An eligible employee is entitled to a total of 12 weeks of FMLA leave in a 12-month period. If the employee has to use some of that leave for another reason, including a difficult pregnancy, it may be counted as part of the 12-week FMLA leave entitlement, according to the Department of Labor.

Monday, March 30, 2009

Department of Labor FAQ - Vacation Pay

Q: How are vacation pay, sick pay, and holiday pay computed and when are they due?

A: The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) does not require payment for time not worked, such as vacations, sick leave or holidays, federal or otherwise.

These benefits are a matter of agreement between an employer and an employee, or the employee's representative.

Source of FAQ: http://www.dol.gov/elaws/faq/esa/flsa/006.htm-->

Friday, March 27, 2009

Cut my retirement health benefits?

Q. I retired last year from a large auto dealership. I thought I was set for life with my retirement benefits. Now I'm hearing that they are considering cutting the retirement health benefits. Can my (former) boss really do that?

A. Maybe. Employees and retirees should know that private-sector employers are not required to promise retiree health benefits. Furthermore, when employers do offer retiree health benefits, nothing in federal law prevents them from cutting or eliminating those benefits--unless they have made a specific promise to maintain the benefits, according to the US Department of Labor. The key to understanding your retiree health benefits lies in the documents governing your plan. Check out the Summary Plan Description (SPD).

If your employer has reserved the right in the SPD and controlling plan document to change the terms of the plan, you may lose coverage at any time during your retirement.

But, if your employer made a clear promise that you will have specific health care benefits for a definite period of time or for life, and did not reserve the right to change the plan, you should be covered, according to the DOL. Find out more information here.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Bypass me for promotion because of pregnancy?

Q. I was bypassed for a major promotion because I am pregnant. Can my boss do this?

A. No. The law is very specific when it comes to pregnancy discrimination. Your employer cannot take away credit for previous work years or seniority because you go on maternity leave, according to the US Department of Labor. These cases can be difficult to prove, as your boss may try to give different reasons for the adverse employment action, so you may need legal counsel. Colorado employment lawyer Kim Ryan handles federal and state pregnancy discrimination claims in Colorado and can be reached at kim@ryanfirm.com.

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Cancel health insurance during military service?

Q. I work for a health care organization and have been called to military active duty for the reserves. I will be deploying to Afghanistan in a few weeks. I talked to the HR assistant in my office, and he tells me he thinks they can discontinue my health insurance while I'm gone. Can my boss do that?

A. No, not if you request continuation of your health insurance.

An employer must continue health insurance for an employee on military duty, if requested, according to the US Department of Labor. The entitlement is for up to 18 months from the date the absence from employment begins.

But, for periods of service in excess of 30 days, the employee may be required to pay up to 102 percent of the total cost of the insurance.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Deny funeral leave?

Q. I lost my beloved brother recently, and we need to go out of state for his funeral. I work for a small mortgate company in Colorado, and my boss says we have no policy allowing funeral leave. He says I can't take even unpaid time to go. Can my boss do that?

A. Generally, yes. Funeral leave is a benefit offered by some employers, but is not legally required by federal law. According to the US Department of Labor, The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) does not require payment for time not worked, including attending a funeral.

This type of benefit is generally a matter of agreement between an employer and an employee (or the employee's representative). If your boss has allowed other employees to take funeral leave, it is possible there might be some kind of discrimination claim, although it could be extremely difficult to prove. Be sure to check your employee handbook to verify your company's written position on funeral leave. If there is in fact a policy, you may have more to go on.

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Fail to Pay Employment Taxes?

Q. It's tax time, and I just found out my boss failed to pay my employment taxes to the IRS. Can my boss do that?

A. Not really. Both employer and employee hold the responsibility for collecting and remitting withholding taxes to the IRS, according to the IRS. For the most part, the employer withholds these taxes on behalf of their employees, but in cases where an employer does not do this, or where an employee is self-employed, it is the responsibility of the employee to pay these withholding taxes.

Employer's Responsibility. Employers must report income and employment taxes withheld from their employees on an Employer's Quarterly Federal Tax Return (Form 941) and deposit these taxes in full to an authorized bank or financial institution pursuant to Federal Tax Deposit Requirements. Employers who do not comply with the employment tax laws may be subject to criminal and civil sanctions for willfully failing to pay employment taxes.

Employee's Responsibility. Employees who do not have taxes withheld nor remit them personally, are still liable for these taxes and may not qualify for Social Security, Medicare, or unemployment benefits.

According to the IRS, employees who are concerned that their employer is improperly withholding or failing to withhold federal income and employment taxes should report their employer by contacting the IRS at 1-800-829-1040.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Fire me for smoking?

Q. I work in Colorado as a secretary for a small real estate company. My boss saw me smoking outside a restaurant the other night, while I was off-duty. He told me that unless I quit smoking, he will fire me. Can my boss really do that?

A. It depends. If your company has more than 15 employees, your boss cannot fire you for smoking off duty, off premises, unless it is a bona fide occupational requirement that you not smoke, or unless it would create a conflict of interest for your employer. Based on the circumstances you describe, it probably would be difficult to say that not smoking is a bone fide occupational qualification or a conflict of interest, so if he fires you for this reason, and you can prove that's the reason, you might have a claim for lost wages and benefits. He can, however, impose smoking restrictions at work. Here's the Colorado law on lawful off duty conduct:

24-34-402.5. Unlawful prohibition of legal activities as a condition of employment.

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Happy St. Patrick's Day!


Happy St. Patrick's Day from Kimberlie Ryan and
The Ryan Law Firm, LLC!

Monday, March 16, 2009

Impose Health Benefits Waiting Period on Return from Active Duty?

Q. My family and I had health coverage under my employer's group health plan before I was called on military active duty. We let this coverage lapse while I was away and took military health coverage. When I returned to my employer from active duty, my boss told me they might impose a waiting period to reenter my employer's health plan. Can my boss do that?

A. Generally, no. Under USERRA (Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act), you and your family should be able to reenter your employer's health plan, according to the US Department of Labor. In addition, your plan generally cannot impose a waiting period or other exclusion period if health coverage would have been provided were it not for military service. The only exception to USERRA's prohibition of exclusions is for an illness or injury determined by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to have been incurred in, or aggravated during, performance of service in the uniformed services, which is covered by the military health plan.

Friday, March 13, 2009

Monitor personal calls at work?

Q. I work long hard hours, and every once in a while I take a break to call my friends from work. My company just released a new employee handbook, and I was alarmed to see that the company says it can monitor my phone calls made in my office. Can my boss really do that?

A. Yes, under limited circumstances. Generally employers can monitor business phones in the ordinary course of business, especially if the company notifies employees in advance that all company property is subject to monitoring. However, once an employer realizes that a call is personal, the employer must immediately stop monitoring the call or risk possible claims for violating federal or state laws. It would not prevent employers from enforcing a policy restricting the number of personal calls from work, though.

Also, kudos to you for reading your employee handbook. That's a huge first step in knowing and protecting your rights at work!

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Deny Leave for Domestic Violence?

Q. My boss denied my request for a couple of days of leave so I can get a restraining order against my ex-husband, who has been stalking me and threatening my safety. I work in Colorado for a private retail business. I am afraid for my safety and my boss won't let me take leave to get help. Can my boss do that?

A. Probably not. Under Colorado law, employers shall permit an employee to request or take up to three working days of leave from work in any twelve-month period, with or without pay, if the employee is the victim of domestic abuse, the victim of stalking, the victim of sexual assault, as these terms are defined by law. This section shall only apply if such employee is using the leave from work to protect himself or herself by:

1. Seeking a civil protection order to prevent domestic abuse;

2. Obtaining medical care or mental health counseling or both for himself or herself or for his or her children to address physical or psychological injuries resulting from the act of domestic abuse, stalking, or sexual assault or other crime involving domestic violence;

3. Making his or her home secure from the perpetrator of the act of domestic abuse, stalking, or sexual assault or other crime involving domestic violence or seeking new housing to escape said perpetrator; or

4) Seeking legal assistance to address issues arising from the act of domestic abuse, stalking, or sexual assault or other crime involving domestic violence and attending and preparing for court-related proceedings arising from said act or crime.

Your employer may require you to exhaust any and all annual or vacation leave, personal leave, and sick leave that may be available to you, unless the employer waives this requirement.

Also, this law prohibits employers from discharging or discriminating against any individual for exercising his or her rights under this section.

This law only applies to employers who employ fifty or more employees and to employees who have been employed with the employer for twelve months or more.

The full text of this Colorado law can be found here: 24-34-402.7. Unlawful action against employees seeking protection.

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Allow sexual orientation harassment?

Q. I work in Colorado for a large hotel chain. Recently a co-worker has found out my sexual orientation and has started harassing me. I heard that federal law does not expressly protect workers based on sexual orientation. I don't want this to be an issue at work, and I prefer to keep my private life private. I think my boss knows about this harassment because she has been present when it has happened, but she has done nothing to stop it. Can my boss do that?

A. No. Although federal law does not yet directly protect workers from harassment based on sexual orientation, Colorado law does. Colorado law protects workers from sexual orientation discrimination and harassment and defines "sexual orientation" as a person's orientation toward heterosexuality, homosexuality, bisexuality, or transgender status or an employer's perception thereof. But the law does not consider the harassment to be illegal unless you first file a complaint with the appropriate authority at your workplace and the company fails initiate a reasonable investigation and take prompt remedial action if appropriate. Here's the Colorado law: 24-34-402. Discriminatory or unfair employment practices.

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Deny Access to My Personnel File?

Q. I work for a Colorado company, and I have received letters of commendation from some of our clients saying what a great job I have done for them in my position. I have submitted them to HR to include in my personnel file. I have asked HR for a copy of my personnel file, and they are telling me that I am not allowed to have a copy of my own personnel file. I checked my employee handbook, and there is no policy on personnel files. HR won't budge and won't give me my file. Can my boss really do that?

A. In Colorado, yes. There is no federal or Colorado state law protecting employees' rights to the personnel files maintained by their private employers. Since these files contain information that could affect workers into the future, employees often would like to see what is in the file, whether it is correct, and when certain personnel actions have occurred. Some employers provide access to personnel files, usually by including something in the handbook, or even allowing employees to verbally request copies. But it is not required in Colorado.

Some states require some form of access, even if it is limited to a review without the opportunity to make copies. The on-line Business Owner's Toolkit provides an excellent summary of state laws on access to personnel files, as well as a recommendation that employers should "allow reasonable access to personnel files as part of a policy of treating employees with fundamental fairness."

Whether Colorado ultimately will pass a law protecting employees' right of access to their workplace information remains an open question. For now, you should keep home copies of all documents provided to you including commendations, discipline, reviews, contracts, handbooks, benefits, and any other documents relating to your employment and work performance.

Monday, March 9, 2009

Deny FMLA to Care for In-Law?

Q. My mother-in-law is ill with shingles, and I need to take leave from work to care for her. My HR manager says that although I would qualify for FMLA, I can't take it to care for an in-law. Can my boss do that?

A. Yes. The FMLA allows unpaid leave for eligible employees to care for an immediate family member with a serious health condition. An employee's spouse, children, and parents are immediate family members for purposes of FMLA. The term "parent" does not include a parent "in-law," according to the US Department of Labor. Under these circumstances, your employer can deny the FMLA leave without violating the FMLA.

Sunday, March 8, 2009

Deny my COBRA coverage?

Q. My health coverage was terminated when my employer shut down and laid off all its workers. HR tells me there is no longer a health plan, but I understand the economic stimulus was supposed to help continue my health coverage through COBRA. Can my boss do that?

A. Possibly. Although the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act provides a premium-reduction to help qualified individuals pay for COBRA continuation health coverage, if there is no longer a health plan, there is often no COBRA coverage available. If related employer or successor employer sponsors a group health plan, it may be responsible for providing coverage to you, according to the US Department of Labor.

If you believe a related or successor employer may be responsible for providing you with COBRA coverage, you can contact the employer directly or EBSA toll free at 1.866.444.3272 to speak to a Department of Labor Benefits Advisor for assistance.

Saturday, March 7, 2009

Require a Doctor's Note for FMLA Leave?

Q. I need to take family and medical leave to help my husband recover from cancer treatments. My employer has a policy for FMLA leave and HR tells me I am eligible, but they are requiring me to provide a certification from the doctor. I don't feel comfortable releasing medical records. Can my boss do that?

A. Yes and no. You do not need to provide medical records. An employer may require that you support the need for leave for a serious health condition of you or your immediate family with a certification issued by a health care provider. Your employer must allow you at least 15 calendar days to obtain the medical certification, according to the Department of Labor.

The Medical Certification form approved by the US Department of Labor can be found here. You can give it to your doctor to fill out.

Include a Non-Compete in the Severance?

Q. I am a Senior Vice President of marketing for a global corporation in a specialized field, and I have been offered a severance package to leave my position after a transition period of 6 months during a corporate restructuring. I have been on good terms with the company and would like to keep it that way. But I am concerned about a provision called, "Non-competition and non-solicitation" that says that I won't compete with the company or any of its affiliates, subsidiaries or other related companies for 2 years. This could effectively keep me from working in my field I hate to lose the severance, but they won't budge. Can they really do that?

A. It depends. Of course, you don't have to sign the agreement. But let's face it, it's hard to turn down a lump sum of money that could tide you over during your transition between jobs. If you do sign the agreement, it is possible, if not likely, that the non-compete provision could be enforced in Colorado under these circumstances. While Colorado law voids certain non-compete agreements, they can be enforceable if the scope, duration, and geographic locations are deemed reasonable, and if you qualify as executive or management personnel.

Never sign a non-compete provision in a severance thinking that you will be able to challenge it later. Get legal advice if you do not fully understand every provision in a severance agreement. Not only can you waive important legal rights in a severance agreement, you may be commiting to agreements like "non-competes" that may severely limit your future income. Since you have a good relationship with the company, you may be able to negotiate with them (either with legal counsel or on your own) to remove the provision, to narrow it, or to increase the amount of severance to account for the time you might be out of the market.

Age discrimination?

Q. I worked as a technical manager for a home improvement store for more than 22 years before I was discharged at age 50. My employment record included favorable performance reviews, bonuses, and salary increases. Everything changed when a 33-year old became the district service manager. He commented unfavorably on my performance, rated me lower on performance appraisals, placed me on a performance improvement plan, and set a deadline for me to identify and organize equipment in a storage area. I was then informed that I was being fired because I failed to meet the deadline and displayed a "lack of ownership" of my responsibilities. Approximately two months before firing me, when I expressed concern about additional responsibilities being assigned to technical managers, he replied, "Hell, you are old enough, you have been around long enough, you should handle this." I've lost my job now, can they really do this?

A. In a similar lawsuit, one court found that a jury could infer age bias under the circumstances you describe because it reflects the boss' awareness your age, not merely your experience or time with the company. If the district manager was directly involved in the decision to fire you, it is possible that a jury could infer from his statement that he was more impatient with you because of your age and held you to a different standard than your coworkers because of your age.

To determine if age was the motivating factor in the discipline and firing, there would be a comparison of treatment of you and similarly situated employees, so it would be helpful to know if other employees in your job position had been treated differently as far as job standards, reviews, performance improvement plans, and termination. This would be a highly fact dependent analysis.

Require English-Only at work?

Q. I work as a housekeeper for a hotel. The hotel has adopted a policy requiring employees to speak only English while in the workplace, including when speaking to coworkers during breaks or when making personal telephone calls. The hotel has placed Hispanic workers under close scrutiny to ensure compliance and has replaced workers who violate the rule with non-Hispanics. I am a native Spanish speaker, and I believe the policy discriminates against me. The hotel states that the rule was adopted to promote better employee relations and to help improve English skills. Can my boss really do this?

A. Under these circumstances, no. Especially if the hotel cannot produce evidence of poor employee relations due to communication in languages other than English. If proficient English skills are not required for any of the positions held by non-native English speakers, or if you can show that the hotel acted in a harassing manner, the English-only rule is likely to be found unlawful.

In some limited circumstances, the EEOC says business necessity could justify an English-only rule, such as for communications with customers, coworkers, or supervisors who only speak English, or for emergencies or other situations in which workers must speak a common language to promote safety. It may also be permissible for cooperative work assignments in which the English-only rule is needed to promote efficiency, or if an employee's job duties require communication with coworkers or customers, it could be permissible to enable a supervisor who only speaks English to monitor the performance of an employee. However even if a policy could be appropriate for some limited circumstances, it is never appropriate to enforce it in a harassing way.

Allow harassment by a non-employee?

Q. I work at a Senior Community as a resident assistant. Our community has "neighborhood days," when we allow senior citizens in the neighborhood to visit the residents. "Charles" frequently visits, and he often yells derogatory comments about Asians at me and has even pushed and tripped me on a few occasions. I'm a Filipino American. I have reported the conduct to a manager, she told me that she cannot take any action against Charles because he is not a resident. On subsequent visits, Charles continues to yell ethnic slurs at me, and I filed an EEOC charge. My employer continues to allow Charles to harass me. Can my boss really do that?

A. No. According to the EEOC, under these circumstances, the employer would be liable for the actions of Charles, a non-employee, because it had the power to control Charles's access to the premises, was aware of Charles's offensive conduct, and did not take corrective action.

It would still be up to you to prove that the conduct was severe or pervasive and that you have suffered damages as a result. It is often difficult to quantify monetary damages for hostile work environment, but the law does allow recovery for emotional distress and punitive damages if you can prove them.

Fire me for referring a pregnant applicant?

Q. I work for a small employment agency with 20 employees. My manager instructed me not to refer any pregnant applicants to a particular client, based on the client's request. Based on my training, I believe this would violate the law against pregnancy discrimination. I refused to obey the order and referred a pregnant applicant to the client. My boss fired me, saying that my refusal to follow her order constituted "insubordination." Can my boss do that?

A. No. At least not without violating the federal employment law prohibiting retaliation. According to the EEOC, refusal to obey an order constitutes protected opposition if the individual reasonably believes that the order requires her to carry out unlawful employment discrimination. Refusal to obey an order also constitutes protected opposition if the individual reasonably believes that the order makes discrimination a term or condition of employment. Title VII applies to employers with more than 15 employees.

Colorado law also expressly prohibits employment agencies from refusing to refer otherwise qualified candidates because of their sex, and Colorado law applies to most employers in Colorado, regardless of the number of employees. Here's the Colorado law on this topic: 24-34-402. Discriminatory or unfair employment practices.

Require me to remove my turban or be fired?

Q. I am a Sikh man and the turban that I wear is a religiously-mandated article of clothing. My supervisor tells me that my because turban makes my coworkers "uncomfortable," he is asking me to remove it or he will fire me. Can my boss really do that?

A. No. According to the EEOC, if a turban is religiously-mandated, you should ask your employer for a religious accommodation to wear it at work. Your employer has a legal obligation to grant your request if it does not impose a burden, or an "undue hardship," under Title VII (the federal law prohibiting religious discrimination in the workplace).

Claiming that your coworkers might be "upset" or "uncomfortable" when they see your turban is not an undue hardship.

Allow co-workers to mock my religion?

Q. I am an Arab American man and have been a salesman at a large car retailer for five years. After September 11, my coworkers stopped talking to me, and there has been a lot of tension. One coworker started calling me names like "camel jockey" and "the local terrorist." I used to have a good relationship with my coworkers and enjoyed my job, but now I dread coming to work each day. I have reported this to management, but my boss says "that's just how they are," and I need to develop a "thicker skin." Can my boss really do that?

A. No. Religious harassment in violation of federal law occurs when employees are subjected to unwelcome statements or conduct that is based on religion and is so severe or pervasive that the individual being harassed reasonably finds the work environment to be hostile or abusive, and there is a basis for holding the employer liable.

According to the EEOC, it is necessary to evaluate all of the surrounding circumstances to determine whether or not particular conduct or remarks are unwelcome. For example, where an employee is upset by repeated mocking use of derogatory terms or comments about his religious beliefs or observance by a colleague, it may be evident that the conduct is unwelcome. In contrast, a consensual conversation about religious views, even if quite spirited, does not constitute harassment if it is not unwelcome.

Religious expression that is repeatedly directed at an employee can become severe or pervasive, whether or not the content is intended to be insulting or abusive. Thus, for example, persistently reiterating religious views to an employee who has asked that this conduct stop can create a hostile environment.

Deny my paternity leave?

Q: I'm a new father. I need to take some leave from work to care for our newborn son, as my wife's leave has ended. Our company has a policy allowing maternity leave and FMLA leave. I even offered to go part-time, but he tells me that he has to keep that part-time slot open in case one of our female workers needs it. He tells me that I cannot take leave, but he has allowed women in our office leave to care for their newborns. Can my boss really do that?

A. No. Employers may not treat either sex more favorably with respect to leave for childcare purposes.

Unfortunately, gender-based stereotypes also influence how male workers are perceived: “Stereotypes about women’s domestic roles are reinforced by parallel stereotypes presuming a lack of domestic responsibilities for men. These mutually reinforcing stereotypes created a self-fulfilling cycle of discrimination," according to the US Supreme Court.

While working women generally have borne the brunt of gender-based stereotyping, unlawful assumptions about working fathers and other male caregivers exist at work. Stereotypes sometimes have led employers to deny male employees opportunities that have been provided to working women. Sometimes they subject men who are primary caregivers to harassment or other discriminatory treatment. For example, some employers have denied male employees’ requests for leave for childcare purposes even while granting female employees’ requests.

Employers are permitted by federal law to provide women with leave specifically for the period that they are incapacitated because of pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions.

But employers may not treat either sex more favorably with respect to other kinds of leave, such as leave for childcare purposes, according to the US EEOC.

To avoid a potential violation, employers should carefully distinguish between pregnancy-related leave and other forms of leave, ensuring that any leave specifically provided to women alone is limited to the period that women are incapacitated by pregnancy and childbirth.

If you are eligible to take FMLA leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act, the leave to care for a newborn child or for a newly placed child must conclude within 12 months after the birth or placement.

Make me take pregnancy leave before I'm ready?

Q. My boss has told me that since I'm "so far along" with my pregnancy, I have to start leave next week. I have already been out a week because of gestational diabetes, and I was able to go back with my doctor's blessing. I'm not ready to go on leave, and I need the extra money before I have the baby. My boss also says our company policy says I can't come back to work for six weeks after I have the baby. I'm afraid I will lose my job. Can my boss really do that?

A. No. Pregnant employees must be permitted to work as long as they are able to perform their jobs. If an employee has been absent from work as a result of a pregnancy-related condition and recovers, her employer may not require her to remain on leave until the baby's birth. An employer also may not have a rule that prohibits an employee from returning to work for a predetermined length of time after childbirth, according to the US EEOC.

Pay me less because of seniority system?

Q. I am a female truck driver, and I have been employed by the company for 6 months. I just found out that a male truck driver is being paid more than I am. I asked my boss about this, and he says he makes more than I do because the company has a written seniority system as part of a collective bargaining agreement with the union. I think this violates the law. Can my boss really do that?

A. It depends. This can be tricky, because it could be considered sex based discrimination if the seniority system is not a bona fide seniority system.

To be a bona fide system, it must not have been adopted with discriminatory intent. According to the EEOC, it also must meet other criteria:

1) It is an established system containing predetermined criteria for measuring seniority, merit, or productivity;

2) It has been communicated to employees; and

3) It has been consistently and even-handedly applied to employees of both sexes.

And of course the system must in fact be the basis for the compensation differential.

According to the EEOC, the Equal Pay Act permits pay differentials when they are based on a bona fide seniority system, merit system, incentive system (in terms of quality or quantity of production), or any other factor other than sex. These are known as "affirmative defenses" and it is the employer's burden to prove that they apply. This defense has failed when applied inconsistently.

The right of employees to be free from discrimination in their compensation is protected under federal laws, including the Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Count my maternity leave as FMLA leave?

Q: Can the employer count my time on maternity leave or pregnancy disability leave as FMLA leave? Can my boss really do that?

A. Yes. At the time of this post, pregnancy disability leave or maternity leave for the birth of a child would be considered qualifying FMLA leave for a serious health condition. The employer may count the leave toward the 12 weeks of leave so long as the employer properly notifies the employee in writing of the designation, according to the US Department of Labor.

Employees are eligible to take FMLA leave if they have worked for their employer for at least 12 months, and have worked for at least 1,250 hours over the previous 12 months, and work at a location where at least 50 employees are employed by the employer within 75 miles.

Can My Boss Really Do That?

I hear this question daily. Workers want to know their rights at work, but often don't know where to begin to find out. And the answers are usually elusive. Workers want a black and white answer in a grey area. Usually the answer to almost any workplace question is "it depends." But every once in a while, we have what we call "black letter law," and I will include it when I can.

Why is it so hard to get a straight answer to such a seemingly simple question? It depends on the facts, which usually differ from one side's perspective to the other. It depends on the state of the law, which is constantly changing. It depends on the information available to you when you are asking the question. And even on how well you can convey the information, to tell your story, if you will.

Sometimes you can find out the answer to your question by doing some research, yet some workplace questions require complex legal analysis that should only be handled by an attorney after a detailed inquiry. Some of the factual scenarios you will see in this blog have been taken directly from enforcement guidance or case law. Others may be responses to reader questons in an effort to provide general information. If we answer your question, we are not providing you with legal advice or representation. Because the laws (and links) change constantly, the information on this blog, while accurate when posted, may become outdated as time passes. Caveat emptor.

While this blog (or its author) cannot provide legal advice to you for a specific factual situation, we can point you toward some of the legal principles that apply to employees in this country and give you some resources to begin your quest of finding out the answer to the elusive question - can my boss really do that?